Improvements for Sunrisers, but last lapse costs big

Two games before their exit, Sunrisers would have believed that despite the inconsistent run their plans for this year had come off

Amol Karhadkar18-May-20152:43

‘Bitter way to finish the tournament’ – Moody

Overview

Sunrisers Hyderabad were one of the two teams, Delhi Daredevils being the other, to make a plethora of changes to its squad ahead of the this IPL. Two games before their exit, Sunrisers would have believed that despite the inconsistent run the plans had come off. They had one foot in the playoffs with just one win needed from two home games.In the end, all of it counted for nought as Sunrisers crumbled under pressure. As much as the last game against Mumbai Indians, a virtual knockout game, would be blamed for their campaign, Sunrisers’ inability to close out games ended up costing them the season. They did hang in there to win three close games, but they would end up ruing their failure to convert a spirited performance against Rajasthan Royals and Delhi Daredevils into points as the key reason for their sixth place in the standings.Sunrisers were the only team that signed English cricketers during the player auction; They had three. The most high profile of them, Kevin Pietersen, backed out twice – at the start, for chasing his England dream and towards the end due to an injury after his national hopes had crashed. The other two England cricketers, Eoin Morgan and Ravi Bopara, were as mediocre as their national team have been in limited-overs cricket. That also cost the team dearly.

High point

For the first time in three seasons in IPL, Sunrisers Hyderabad managed to register a hat-trick of wins. It started off with a high-scoring game against Rajasthan Royals in Mumbai, continued in an away game in Raipur against Delhi Daredevils and culminated at home with a narrow win against Kings XI Punjab. The longest streak of wins was definitely sweeter than the individual sparks of brilliances in their campaign.

Low point

It has to be the last league game against Mumbai Indians. What would hurt more than the loss is the manner in which they surrendered. In a winner-takes-all situation, Sunrisers just didn’t turn up, gifting the playoffs place to Mumbai Indians.

Top of the class

Bhuvneshwar Kumar was excellent throughout the league stage. Moises Henriques was a revelation in the latter half. Still, their performances were overshadowed by David Warner. The opening batsman took the meaning of the term ‘leading from the front’ to a new level, at least in T20. Not only did he top the run charts for the league stage but he was also adjudged Man of the Match in four of Sunrisers’ seven wins.

Under-par performer

Kevin Pietersen’s absence meant Eoin Morgan got an extended run in the tournament. But he could hardly justify the opportunity. No doubt that the price tag of Rs 1.5 crore wasn’t enormous but the responsibility on his shoulders certainly was. One Man of the Match and a tally of 187 runs from nine innings were meagre.

Tip for 2016

Kane Williamson should be made better use of. In a struggling battling line-up, Williamson can be the perfect anchor, thus freeing up Warner and Dhawan at the top. Also, Sunrisers desperately need to bolster their domestic batting. KL Rahul and Hanuma Vihari will find it tough to break into any IPL eleven, yet they had to be persisted with. Naman Ojha, their most high-profile domestic batsman, had a horrendous run with bat as well.

No. 6: Michael Hussey

At No. 6 in the former Australia captain’s Ashes XI: a man they called Mr Cricket

Ricky Ponting11-Jul-20151:40

Michael Hussey

“One of the guys you love to have around the team because he will do anything for you. A team man and a classy middle-order player. When games were on the line, Michael Hussey generally stood up”

Stats

OVERALL: Matches 79 Innings 137 Runs 6235 Average 51.52 100s/50s 19/29
ASHES: Matches 15 Innings 24 Runs 1304 Average 59.27 100s/50s 4/9

Best performance

121 at The Oval, 2009
Australia faced the prospect of losing the Ashes once they were set a target of 546 in the final Test at The Oval. It was a crucial innings for Michael Hussey: his Test future seemed in doubt after a first-innings duck and a century-less streak of 28 innings. He joined Ponting with Australia at 90 for 2. The duo’s partnership gave the visitors hope but an errant call for a run by Hussey led to Ponting’s dismissal. Hussey found some support from Brad Haddin, but that was not enough as he was last man out for 121, an innings that kept his career alive.

Trivia

Michael Hussey has the best average among left-hand batsmen who’ve scored more than 1000 runs in the Ashes.

Warner equals Gavaskar with consecutive tons

Stats highlights from Perth where David Warner played a special innings on the first day of the second Test against New Zealand

Shiva Jayaraman13-Nov-20152004 Last time an Australia opener made a double-hundred in Tests before David Warner in this match, which was by Justin Langer against the same opposition at the Adelaide Oval. This is Warner’s highest score in Tests. His previous highest too came at the WACA, against India in 2012. Warner’s 244* is also the second-highest by a batsman in Tests in Perth.6 Instances when a batsman has scored more than Warner’s 244 in a single day’s play in a Test. The last instance when a batsman did so was Virender Sehwag’s 284 on the second day of the Mumbai Test against Sri Lanka in 2009. There are only two other instances of an Australia batsman scoring more in a day than Warner: both of which were by Don Bradman.416 Runs scored on the first day at the WACA – the third-highest in a day’s play and the highest on the first day at this venue. As many as 446 runs were scored on the second day’s play in a Test between the hosts and Zimbabwe in 2003 which is the highest in a day in Perth. The 416 runs in this Test are also the fourth-highest on the first day of a Test in Australia. The last time more runs were scored on the first day of a Test in this country was in 2012 when 482 runs were amassed at the Adelaide Oval.2004 The last time more runs were scored for the loss of just one or no wickets in a day in Tests. Sri Lanka had made 425 runs for the loss of Sanath Jayasuriya’s wicket on the second day’s play in Bulawayo. There is only one other instance when a day’s play had seen just one wicket fall and more than 416 runs made: when Bradman and Bill Ponsford plundered 455 runs on the second day of the Headingley Test.1 Openers before Warner who had made hundreds in three consecutive Test innings, twice. Sunil Gavaskar had had two such runs – once in the West Indies in 1971 and once against Pakistan and West Indies in 1978-79. This was Warners’ second such streak in the last two years: he had made three consecutive Test centuries against South Africa and Pakistan last year. Overall, Warner is only the fifth batsman to make three or more consecutive hundreds twice in his career. The others are Everton Weekes, Aravinda de Silva and Kumar Sangakkara, who had three such streaks.4 Test hundreds by Warner against New Zealand in just four Tests against them. This is the least any batsman has taken to make four hundreds against them. Wally Hammond and Shoaib Mohammad had each taken six Tests to hit four hundreds against New Zealand.1934 The last and the only time a pair added more runs for Australia’s second wicket in Tests than the 302 added by Warner and Usman Khawaja in this innings. Bradman and Ponsford had added 451 England at The Oval. This was also the first 300-run stand for any wicket for Australia since Ricky Ponting and Michael Clarke added 386 for the fourth wicket against India at the Adelaide Oval in 2012-13. The second-wicket partnership in this innings was also the second-highest stand for any wicket in Tests at the WACA.3 Century stands by Australia’s openers in this series – only the fourth time a team has had three or more century opening partnerships in a series involving three or fewer matches. The last such instance was by Pakistan at home against South Africa in 2003. Warner and Burns have added 499 runs in this series. This is already the second highest added by Australia for the first wicket in a series involving three or fewer matches. Australia’s openers added 570 runs in a three-Test series at home against South Africa in 2001-02, which are the highest.84 Innings Warner has taken to complete 4000 Test runs. He is the fourth-fastest Australia batsman to the landmark. Don Bradman (48 innings), Matthew Hayden (77 innings) and Neil Harvey (84 innings) are the only other Australia batsman faster than Warner.1968 Last time before Warner an Australia opener had made two or more scores of 150-plus in a Test series. Bill Lawry had made two such scores – 151 and 205 – against the visiting West Indies. Warner’s is only the fifth such instance by an Australia opener.152 Khawaja’s average in this series; his 121 in this innings was his second hundred of the series and also his second in Tests. Khawaja has made 302 runs in his last three innings against New Zealand. In 17 innings before this year, he had made 377 runs at 25.13 with two fifties.

The decline, fall and redemption of James Muirhead

A wrist injury put the Australian legspinner’s career and life in a tailspin. But now he’s slowly getting back on track

Tom Morris02-Dec-2015Do you remember James Muirhead? The fresh-faced wristspinner who fell off the scene faster than he burst on it two summers ago. Ring a bell?At the start of the 2013-14 Australian season, Muirhead was not deemed good enough to warrant a Big Bash contract. By the end of it, he was Australia’s first-choice wristspinner in limited-overs cricket.Nicknamed “Vegemite” for his rosy red cheeks, Muirhead has had a journey not yet a fraction complete. Already the uncertainties, tribulations and utter frustrations of being a professional cricketer have forced him to question the path that, in relative terms, he has only just begun.I must confess I share a close bond with Jimmy. I’ve kept wicket to him, batted with him many times, and trained alongside him. I’ve watched him grow from a supremely confident 3rd XI legspinner at Shane Warne’s old club, St Kilda, to an international cricketer who tumbled back down the ranks again.One week he was playing 3rd XI club cricket on the Ross Gregory Oval, the next, it seemed, he was dismissing Indian maestro Virat Kohli in a World T20 encounter in Dhaka.He’s only 22, but already his career reflects a game of snakes and ladders.Muirhead played the last of his five international T20s last March and, in the 18 months between then and now, his troubles have brewed internally and materialised externally in disturbing fashion. Watching from just 22 yards away, I’ve had front-row seats and at times it has not been pretty. The troubles first started in October 2014.

“I used to think I’d dominate no matter what. Now I know I have to work really hard to compete”James Muirhead

In February that year, an article was published on ESPNcricinfo, titled “The rapid rise of James Muirhead”. Even the man himself now concedes it would be fair to write a story that is the precise mirror image of the original. “I was at rock bottom earlier this year,” Muirhead said last week.”I went to South Africa with Australia and then to the World T20 in Bangladesh. It was an amazing experience. I sat next to Dale Steyn after a game in the change rooms and couldn’t even speak, I was in such awe.”I came home and played a Shield game against NSW at the SCG. That’s when my wrist that I rely on for spin began to ache.”Towards the end of last season, the zip and bounce that had been his forte deserted him. I’d watch in amazement as he would ask club captain Rob Quiney to remove him from the attack. “I’m struggling, bruz,” he’d say before trudging down to fine leg. Confidence shot, he was a shadow of his former self. This happened Saturday after Saturday and game after game for months.Throughout this period, fellow Victorian legspinner Fawad Ahmed was on his way to claiming a competition-high 48 wickets for the season, making it almost impossible for Muirhead to force his way back into the team – even if he did bowl well at club level.”I didn’t really tell anyone about my wrist until it got really bad. It wasn’t one incident, it just got progressively worse the more I bowled. I couldn’t hear the clicking sound in my hand when I let the ball go, so I knew something was wrong. When I bowl well, my wrist clicks and the ball fizzes out – this stopped happening,” he said.”Having no confidence really got to me and I struggled to get out of bed some mornings. I didn’t want to train and I have no doubt I was depressed. It was very difficult times. Everything just spiralled down.”In a short span of time Muirhead went from turning out for St Kilda’s 3rd XI to dismissing batsmen in the World T20•Associated PressCricket clubs can be ruthless places, especially successful ones like St Kilda Cricket Club. From 2000 to 2006, the Saints won five two-day 1st XI premierships and this win-at-all-costs mantra still exists today. Every individual gets analysed, people talk, nobody is spared critical judgement.Success is expected, both individually and collectively. Hardened professionals like Michael Beer, Graeme Rummans, Peter Handscomb, Quiney and Muirhead train alongside school teachers, carpenters and University students. So when Jimmy was struggling, it was natural that people would wonder why.”I couldn’t get the revolutions on the ball and I began to worry about what people were saying about me,” he said.”I’d never cared before, but for some reason now I did and it consumed me. It was as if everyone from the firsts to fourths were looking at me thinking I was shit. I didn’t want to train and I just wanted to quit.”I started to think I might have to find a job even though I knew I had three years left on my state contract. Mentally, I was in a shocking place and I now know I will never be lower than that again.”There was one summer evening where he refused to bowl in the nets – unheard of for someone of his standing. I later found out it was because he was terribly embarrassed. He was bowling a long hop every second ball and being belted out of the net. He’d go and retrieve the ball, put on a brave face, and the same thing would happen again. It must have been demoralising. There was nothing any of us could say that could make him feel better. Physically he was struggling with his wrist, but mentally, he had plummeted to an entirely new low.

“You can see he’s a real natural legspinner. There’s a lot of sidespin on the ball. He gets really big turn. I think that’s got everyone excited”Cameron White

Surgery was initially delayed in the hope that rest would be the cure. It didn’t, so in June 2015, Muirhead went under the knife. The recovery period was six to eight weeks, but in reality he is only just finding his old self again now.”I was in such a bad way mentally because of my bowling,” he said. “I couldn’t understand why one day I would be dipping and ripping the ball, and then a couple of months later I was in pain and was hardly spinning it. Surgery allowed me to refresh and almost start again in some ways.”But to paint a picture of eternal doom and gloom would be to dismiss the journey of fellow twirler Brad Hogg, or to a lesser extent Chris Rogers and Adam Voges. For cricket is a pursuit that often favours the stubborn over the skilful – a fact Muirhead, who has a Perth Scorchers and Cricket Victoria contract, is acutely aware of, following a harrowing 18 months. Like so many before him, he knows he possesses the raw skills. Yet at the elite level, pure talent is nowhere near enough.In many respects it has been his close bond with talismanic chinaman and eternal optimist Hogg that has allowed the western suburbs-raised Muirhead to gain perspective in times of despair.”I work very closely with Hoggy at the Scorchers now and he’s really kept me going through the bad times,” he said.”It doesn’t matter where he is or what time of the day it is, he answers my calls and he’s been exceptionally influential on my life. I actually spoke to him yesterday. He rang me to speak to me about my goals and to see how I was going. Without him I am not sure where I’d be.”I understand now it is not going to be easy. I used to think I’d dominate no matter what. Now I know I have to work really hard to compete.”The other person who he credits with helping halt his rapid slide is Cricket Victoria psychologist Tony Glynn.Glynn, who worked closely with Victoria’s cricketers after Phil Hughes’ tragic death last year, has been spending an hour per week with Muirhead for the past eight months – something the legspinner would have laughed off had he been offered psychological assistance three years ago.In an Ashes tour game in November 2013, Muirhead took the wickets of Alastair Cook (twice), Ian Bell and Kevin Pietersen•Getty Images”I would have said, ‘What are sports psychologists for? You don’t even need them. They are a waste of money’,” he conceded. “Now I realise, having experienced the highs and the bad lows, that they are crucial. Tony helps me develop routines, set goals and gives me another person to talk to.”Roger Federer, Adam Scott, Steve Smith, and all these elite athletes have deeply embedded routines. I never thought about it before, but now when I watched these guys play, I see their routine. I didn’t have one but now I do. It allows me to have a default setting for when I play if things go wrong.”When he’s at his pomp, Muirhead’s greatest asset is the wicked revolutions he imparts on the ball. Facing him in the nets, your audible signals are just as important as the visual cues. His legbreak fizzes through the air, the tiny rope on the seam rotating so viciously it creates enough friction to hear quite unmistakably. Probably the only thing more daunting than facing him is keeping to him on a tired wicket.”I’ve stood at slip in the three T20 games he’s played for Australia and you can just see he’s a real natural legspinner of the ball – there’s a lot of sidespin on the ball,” Cameron White said last year. “He gets really big turn. I think that’s got everyone excited, including the people he plays with.”Muirhead, who has played for three Big Bash franchises, does not see himself as the next Shane Warne, despite the early comparisons. He does not aspire to be Stuart MacGill or Yasir Shah, or anyone else, really. As his club and state team-mates will strongly attest, Jimmy just wants to be Jimmy and turn the ball as sharply as his rehabilitated wrist will allow. Last week he played for Victoria’s Futures League team against the ACT at his home ground, the Junction Oval, in a four-day game. Although his figures were modest (one wicket in the first innings), his control was back. “It was a flat deck and was relatively happy with how they came out,” he said. “I’m getting back to where I want to be.”Muirhead has been forced to wade through thick mud. Dirtied and demonised by the terrors in his own mind, he could have thrown in the towel, but he didn’t. If he makes it back to the apex of the cricketing mountain, he will undoubtedly be better for what he has endured. His list of scalps does not include names like Gayle, Pietersen, Duminy, Gibbs and Kohli for nothing.

Flaccid finish is leaving more questions than answers

A series win in South Africa is a notable achievement, but England are still going to finish the series with some familiar issues to overcome

George Dobell in Centurion24-Jan-2016Whatever happens over the last couple of days of this series – and it will take a bit of a miracle to deny South Africa a consolation victory – it seems England will finish their winter of Test action with just about as many questions to answer as they had at the start.It would be harsh to suggest that England, victors in South Africa for the first time in more than a decade, have failed to make any progress. They have seen Steven Finn cement his position as first-choice third seamer and Ben Stokes develop both as a batsman (he has scored more runs than any other England player in this series) and as a bowler (among England’s bowlers, only Stuart Broad has taken more wickets). And Jonny Bairstow has proven himself as a batsman, if not yet as a Test-quality wicketkeeper.But the holes that existed before exist still. Alex Hales has not convinced as opening position, Nick Compton has not made himself impossible to drop at No. 3, while James Taylor, despite his outstanding fielding at short-leg, has averaged a modest 30 in his four-and-a-half Tests this winter. All three may yet go a long way towards proving themselves in their final innings of this series but, as things stand, Gary Ballance and Ian Bell will feel that, if they start the domestic season well, they have a strong chance of a recall.Perhaps that is harsh on Compton. His batting went a long way to winning the Durban Test and he was pretty much blameless for his first innings lbw here. He may still be England’s best bet as an opening partner for Alastair Cook, though that would leave a question over who should bat at No. 3. Joe Root is one option, but it may be weakening a strength to move him from the No. 4 position where he has dominated.Equally, England started the winter with questions over Jos Buttler as keeper, and end them with questions over Bairstow as keeper. Bairstow has missed seven of the 23 chances he has been offered in the series and, in failing to cling on to his opportunities – a couple of them tough – by the three centurions in this game (Hashim Amla on 5, Quinton de Kock on 80 and Stephen Cook on 47) he could be argued to have cost his side 221 runs. England’s catching will have to improve if they are to progress up the world rankings.Moeen Ali, meanwhile, despite a pleasing innings here – his first Test half-century since the Edgbaston Ashes Test in July, 15 innings ago – has averaged 19 with the bat and 45.47 with the ball over the two series against Pakistan and South Africa. Chris Woakes has one last chance on the fourth morning to prove himself with the ball while Jimmy Anderson, while still all but certain to play against Sri Lanka, would love to prove that he no longer requires help from English-style conditions to prosper. It is not so long ago that he was England best bowler in the UAE.England’s catching has not been of the standard required at Test level•Getty ImagesThere was little wrong with England’s batting here. Of the top seven, only Taylor – trying to hook a ball for eight – and, to a lesser extent, Hales, had cause to regret their choice of shot. The rest of them were out to fine deliveries on an increasingly tricky surface. Maybe one or two of them could have left the balls they edged, but when some balls are shooting and others rearing, batting is far from easy.England’s problem is that they conceded at least 100 more runs than they should have done in South Africa’s first innings. Their bowling in the first two sessions of the match and their failure to accept chances in the field allowed South Africa to establish a lead that is likely to prove decisive. With the variable bounce likely to become more pronounced as the game progresses, a target of 250 in the fourth innings could prove desperately difficult.”It’s going to be tough,” Moeen Ali, who reckoned England could chase 300, admitted after play on day three. “There are a lot of cracks. There is up and down movement and a bit of spin as well. We’re going to have to play extremely well to get anything out of this game.”We’re going to have to bowl them out quickly in the morning and then bat really well.”We dropped a lot of catches. A lot of very important catches. Three guys made hundreds and we dropped all three of them.”The highest fourth-innings total here in a Test is England’s 251 for 8 in January 2000. In reality, though, that was the second innings of the now-notorious match in which both sides forfeited an innings. In a more conventional situation, the highest fourth-innings total is England’s 228 for 9 in 2009, in which they clung on by their fingernails for a draw. The highest total to win in a match where all four innings occurred is South Africa’s 226 for 4 in 1998. History is not on England’s side.The only chink of light from an England perspective is the possibility that South Africa may be reduced to a two-man seam attack. Kyle Abbott was forced off the pitch with a hamstring strain towards the end of England’s innings and may well be unable to bowl in their second. That would leave a heavy burden on Kagiso Rabada and Morne Morkel but, with the pitch turning and Rabada fast emerging as Dale Steyn’s long-term replacement, England will still face a desperately tough challenge.

India knock Bangladesh out of WT20 in thriller

ESPNcricinfo staff23-Mar-2016Bangladesh, however, hit back by removing Rohit Sharma and Shikhar Dhawan in the space six balls•AFPSuresh Raina then came in and put up a 50-run partnership with Virat Kohli•Associated PressShuvagata Hom dismissed Kohli and Bangladesh began to strangle India’s momentum•AFPAl-Amin Hossain added to India’s woes by sending back Raina and Hardik Pandya off consecutive balls in the 16th over•AFPYuvraj Singh struggled to find timing as he could manage only 3 off 6 balls•IDI/Getty ImagesMS Dhoni could not provide India an explosive finish and scratched around for a 12-ball 13*•IDI/Getty ImagesMustafizur Rahman bowled a tight last over that produced the wicket of Ravindra Jadeja to help his side keep India to 146•AFPTamim Iqbal made a brisk 35 to set Bangladesh on course in the chase•AFPR Ashwin then brought India back with the timely wickets of Mohammad Mithun in his first spell, and Shakib Al Hasan in his second•AFPRavindra Jadeja slipped one past Tamim in the eighth over•AFPMashrafe Mortaza came in at No. 5, but could only manage 6, as the match started to tilt in India’s favour.•AFPBut Bangladesh kept fighting. Soumya Sarkar made a valuable 21 in the end overs as the equation boiled down to 11 needed off the final over•IDI/Getty ImagesIn the last over bowled by Hardik Pandya, Mushfiqur Rahim hit two boundaries off the second and third ball…•AFP… before falling with Bangladesh two runs short of the target•AFPPandya got Mahmudullah off the next ball and Bangladesh required two off the last ball•AFPPandya held his nerve to bowl a short-of-length ball, wide of Shuvagata Hom. Hom missed it, and Dhoni ran Mustafizur out to knock Bangladesh out of the World T20•AFP

Shami bounces back with new weapon

Returning to Test cricket after a long layoff, Mohammed Shami ran up with noticeably shorter strides and dismantled West Indies’ top order with pace and bounce

Karthik Krishnaswamy in Antigua24-Jul-20162:11

Manjrekar: ‘Heartening to see Shami, Umesh vary their lengths’

On Friday evening, Mohammed Shami took his first Test wicket in a year, six months, and 13 days. If any wicket is worth that long a wait, one necessitated by injury, surgery, and 40 days on crutches, this was probably it.The seam was bolt upright as the ball left Shami’s hand, with no hint of wobble, and the impact of seam on turf caused the ball to move away from Rajendra Chandrika. It pitched just short of a good length, not too far from off stump, climbed a few inches more than Chandrika possibly expected, and drew an instinctive jab. Outside edge taken, chance accepted, and West Indies, replying to India’s 566 for 8 declared, were 29 for 1.It was a beautiful delivery, from a bowler fully capable of bowling them, but perhaps few had really expected him to produce that particular kind of delivery.Before this Test, 48.94% of Shami’s Test wickets were either bowled or leg before, and only 31.91% caught behind or in the slip cordon. Those numbers reflected the skills he was primarily known for: pace, a fullish, attacking length, and an ability to reverse the ball. He possessed a sharp bouncer too, but did not necessarily generate steep bounce from a good length or just short of it.He often got wickets for the opposite reason, with balls that skidded on, losing very little pace off the pitch, reaching the batsman quicker than expected, perhaps even a shade lower than expected, and punishing them for camping in the crease.Marlon Samuels knew all about this. Shami, on Test debut, had dismissed him twice with deliveries skidding through from that perfect length, the shortest possible length he could land on while still hitting the stumps. Samuels was caught on the crease both times, bowled for 65 in the first innings and lbw for 4 in the second.On Saturday, two-and-a-half years later, Samuels faced Shami again. He seemed to be reminding himself of those dismissals, and seemed to be a man fighting his muscle memory, a man of sluggish footwork telling himself to press forward. The result of that internal struggle was a sort of crouching shuffle across the crease, and Shami wrong-footed him twice with bouncers. Samuels got under both of them, hunching awkwardly low.Shami’s 16th ball to Samuels landed on the fullish side of a good length, in the corridor. Samuels shuffled across once more, leaning forward, and aimed for a push into the covers. All he managed was a thin edge. It settled snugly in Wriddhiman Saha’s gloves, and Shami had become the joint-quickest Indian fast bowler to 50 Test wickets.Once again there was movement, and once again a bit of extra bounce. The ball had brushed the edge of Samuels’ bat close to its shoulder. In between the Chandrika and Samuels dismissals, Shami had dismissed Darren Bravo with a not dissimilar delivery, though shorter. Three balls after sending back Samuels, he got Jermaine Blackwood to fend another awkwardly lifting ball to gully.Four wickets, all of them the result of extra bounce. This was new, and unexpected. It caused you to watch every step of his action just that little closer. Once you did that, there was one obvious change from the Shami of old.Former West Indies fast bowler Ian Bishop was pleased with Shami’s alignment at the crease, his feet lined up to point him precisely where he wanted to bowl•Getty ImagesIn his first couple of years of international cricket, Shami had an idiosyncratic run to the crease, a gallop of unusually long strides. A number of experts had suggested this could cause a loss of stability when he reached the crease, and had ascribed this as a reason for his tendency to bowl loose balls. Around the time of the 2015 World Cup, Shami had said he was making an effort to shorten his running strides, and had credited Shoaib Akhtar with giving him the suggestion.Now, making his Test comeback at the Sir Vivian Richards Stadium, Shami was sprinting in with noticeably shorter strides. The question still remained: did this have any connection with the bounce he was generating?Pondering it, Ian Bishop, the former West Indies fast bowler, suggested the bounce might have had less to do with shorter running strides than with a possible knock-on effect: a shorter delivery stride. This, he said, would give the bowler a higher point of release, and, as a consequence, the possibility of extra bounce. He took the example of Shannon Gabriel, who had troubled India with steep lift during their first innings.Before he suffered the ankle injury that cut short his 2015-16 Australia tour, Gabriel’s delivery stride, Bishop said, had grown progressively longer without him quite realising it, causing him to lose height at the crease.In the months following his recovery, Gabriel had worked hard to correct this. It wasn’t easy to tell if Shami had also, by design or as a byproduct of his reduced running stride, shortened his delivery stride, but Bishop felt he was achieving good height at release. What also pleased him was Shami’s alignment at the crease, his feet lined up to point him precisely where he wanted to bowl.It told in his line. On a pitch where bounce often seemed to be the fast bowler’s only friend, Ishant Sharma may have been expected to provide the main threat, but while he did achieve steep lift, his line wasn’t as close to off stump as Shami’s. He did not make the batsmen play as often, and did not, as a result, force as many errors.As the rest of West Indies’ top order crumbled around him, Kraigg Brathwaite waged lonely resistance, his method simple and effective. Blessed with excellent judgment of line, he ignored as many deliveries as he could outside off stump, and waited patiently for straighter balls he could work into the leg side. Forty-eight of his 74 runs came in that direction. The cover drive barely made an appearance. Most of his off-side runs came square or behind square, when the bowlers dropped short.In all, Brathwaite left 53 balls. But he didn’t leave with equal ease against all of India’s bowlers. He left 31 of the 67 balls he faced from Ishant, 13 out of 45 from Umesh Yadav, and only 6 out of 31 from Shami. He passed Shami’s fourth-stump examination, but four of his team-mates didn’t.This, in short, was high-class Test bowling: pace, movement, and that new-found bounce, all allied to an excellent length and a line that forced the batsmen to play, or think about playing. A better batting side may have made fewer mistakes, but Shami was still asking the right questions, over and over.

'His smile lit up the room'

Twitter reactions on the passing of former Australia seamer Max Walker, who died aged 68

ESPNcricinfo staff28-Sep-2016

Kohli, Rahane sizzle to put India on top

08-Oct-2016New Zealand lost their third consecutive toss, but had early success when Jeetan Patel snuffed out M Vijay•BCCIGautam Gambhir, replacing Shikhar Dhawan, marked his return to Test cricket with confidence, and raced away with consecutive sixes against Matt Henry•BCCIHe looked especially comfortable against spin in an assured second-wicket stand with Cheteshwar Pujara•BCCIHowever, Trent Boult beat Gambhir’s inside-edge and rapped him on the pads for 29•BCCIPujara and Virat Kohli then took India to 75 for 2 at lunch•BCCIPujara resumed confidently after the break, before he fell to a ripper from Mitchell Santner that took out his off stump•Associated PressBut Virat Kohli moved his feet well and held firm in the midst of a testing spell from the New Zealand spinners. In the company of Ajinkya Rahane, he steered India to 148 for 3 at tea•BCCIKohli raised his half-century soon after the break with a neat drive through covers•BCCIRahane was on the receiving end of short balls throughout his stay•BCCIBut he hung on and when the full ones came, he put them away en route to his 10th Test fifty•BCCIKohli scampered through for a single and beat a direct throw at the non-striker’s end to raise his 13th Test century•AFPThe Kohli-Rahane partnership realised 167 unbeaten runs, and took India to 267 for 3 when stumps were drawn•AFP

Newspaper nostalgia

A fan takes us on his journey of watching cricket matches before the era of cable TV – through print

Anand Mamidipudi30-Nov-2016I still remember the smell of the newspaper when he hit that six that shattered a generation of hope. At the age of ten, I was standing in the lobby of our hotel in Sikkim, holding that hitherto unclaimed newspaper with trembling hands, as I visualised a hapless Chetan Sharma running to the wicket like a gullible lamb toward a lion’s den. Sharma then bowled what can best be described as a “lolly”, which was launched into orbit by Javed Miandad, doing his best impersonation of Obelix’s “PFAFF!!”. The legend goes that the ball was never recovered because it melted into thin air upon crossing the boundary.It did not matter that I had heard about this unfortunate event on the train to Sikkim the previous night. I was travelling on a school excursion and came across a crestfallen passenger who told me that the world had just ended in Sharjah. However, I did not truly believe him until I read about it in the newspaper the next morning. This was true of most matches that I “watched” in my childhood. To me, they only materialised when they appeared in the newspaper the next day.Take, for instance, Ravi Shastri’s heroic 107 on a bouncy pitch in Barbados; it was an innings that should have won him an award for bravery. It came against a fearsome West Indies attack that read: Marshall, Ambrose, Bishop and Walsh. Even as the rest of the Indian batting line-up crumbled around him in a heap to 63 for 6, the statuesque Shastri struck 12 boundaries in a dogged riposte. I followed the match through a newspaper, with a one-day delay and a heavy dose of imagination. He must have hit the peerless Malcolm Marshall for at least a couple of fours. Surely one of them was a “chapati” shot.You see, Shastri was my hero because he played these match-defining innings that became commonplace when a curly-haired 16-year-old emerged to dominate the sport. Until Sachin Tendulkar arrived, I drew succour from the many displays of batting obduracy from Shastri, who seemed to use a bat to win a staring contest on the pitch. His was the first name I checked on the scorecard in the newspaper, even if his more gifted, but infuriatingly fragile colleagues scored more runs. I knew from my newspaper snippets that Shastri had often patted down many thunderbolts as an opener before he gave way to the frail wizardry of Mohammad Azharuddin.One year, I willed myself to learn the Telugu alphabet because the Telugu daily showed up at our doorstep a couple of hours before the English newspapers. It gave me great joy to read “A..ja.. ha.. roo..din” next to the score of 109, a withering display of artistry in an otherwise soporific series played on dead pitches in Pakistan. India somehow claimed a 0-0 moral victory in that series. No matter the result, there was unbridled joy in reading about my Hyderabadi idol’s conquest of Mt Imran. Imran Khan was caned to the tune of 100 runs, which was fitting balm for the failure of a certain RJ Shastri, who scored a total of 16 runs in two innings. I would be remiss in not mentioning young Tendulkar’s brilliant 59, in only his second Test, a harbinger of many superhuman feats.

To me, matches only materialised when they appeared in the newspaper the next day

Newspapers have given way to a digital form of media, most of which are quite effective in representing this great sport, but nothing that I tell my seven-year-old son will convince him that reading cricket news in the early morning newspaper was a multi-sensory experience. It involved touch, smell, sight and, most importantly, boundless imagination. Even as every word unravelled in front of my eyes, my mind drew batting arcs and banana swings to fashion memorable suspense-filled storylines.There is a distinct memory in my mind of a match that I went to see in Lal Bahadur Stadium in Hyderabad in 1987. I was 11. This was the second ODI between Pakistan and India. At this time, India were finding every possible way to lose to Pakistan, and I held very little hope that the result would be any different that day. India scored a respectable 212 in 44 overs, powered by Shastri’s 69 not out. One of his two sixes landed a few feet from my seat in the pavilion, which is one of my career highlights as a cricket fan.Pakistan inevitably began chasing down the target, powered by Saleem Malik’s 84, much to the chagrin of the full crowd in Hyderabad. Run by run the target was being shaved down with precision. Still, India managed to keep the game close till the very end. In fact, so close that the run equation came down to Pakistan needing two off the last ball. Abdul Qadir faced the redoubtable Kapil Dev and the entire stadium waited with bated breath. What happened next was a blur.Kapil Dev ran in and bowled, Qadir tried an agricultural swing. The ball squirted off his edge and then there was bedlam. It appeared that Qadir had run himself out trying to get the winning run and the scores were miraculously tied! Nobody in the crowd was quite sure what had happened. After a few minutes, there was an announcement on the speaker saying that India had won the match because they had lost fewer wickets. While the crowd roared its approval, I sensed that something was off. The result was surreal. The ending was farcical theatre.I realised that there was only one way to fix the confusion in my mind. The next morning, I jumped out of bed at 6am and ran excitedly towards our verandah. Lying on the floor was a fresh, untouched copy of the . I got goosebumps as I began to slowly peel apart the pages to reveal the match that I was going to “watch” again.Want to be featured on Inbox? Send your articles to us here, with “Inbox” in the subject line.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus